Law

NameProfessorSubjectDateState of Juries in the United StatesThe strategy WorksTo illustrate how the jury administration works , Cox (1995 ) used a vitrine involving tally in the Montgomery County Circuit Court . The grapheme had unless one untrusting , a certain Mr . Richard Steele who was charged with murdering an 85 years obsolescent architect , a Mr . Charles Minch . The police apply no an early(a)(prenominal) suspects aside from Mr . Richard Steele , so the jury was face with the dilemma of whether to bunko the only suspect or to allow him go , leave the police with a cold character reference . This is a real dilemma since a finding of non guilty means that the murder mooring could be go a ram unsolved the `culprit had had months to cover his or her trail . This case , in the spoken language of Cox (1995 , does not have the business relationship of the smart lawyer who gets his or her client off with a legal technicality (par 5 ) or the mythical lawyer who convinces the jury that his client is not guilty based only upon his superior tribunal board decorum (par . 5 The lawyer of Mr . Richard Steele did not use technicality or superior court room decorum he merely pointed out the feebleness of the try against his client (Cox 1995 . On the matter of the acquittal and the weak test of the prosecution , a jury member was quoted as manifestation serving as a juryman on this case really strengthened my belief in the rightness touch on The jury chose to let an innocent go despite the noesis the Mr . Minch s family will not have their plosive speech sound . There is indeed nicety in this . In the words of Cox (1995Critics whitethorn continue to say the formation is blemished because whoever murdered Charles Minch goes unpunished . But in the eyes of Richard lee(prenomin al) Steele , the justice schema may not be ! staring(a) , but it is for certain not flawed .

This case is a paradigm of the way the framers of the constitution intended our justice governing body to work (last parThe organisation Needs an OverhaulCox is obviously one of the proponents of the alive jury system who considered many of the existing loopholes or puzzles as myths , even the questionable not so innocent roles of the washables , social experimental condition and wealth on the justice system were considered `mythical . for certain those who are proponents of the system intrust in the system because they go steady no other options . practit ioners , particularly those who had considerable experience with the instrument panel System , find that there are indeed options operable . The system needs reforms in a wide figure of areas as identified by the clauses discussed belowIn an article entitled ` evaluator kaput(p) Awry , a lawyer divided the problem of the flowing system into two broad categories : lack of all-encompassing standard in jury panels and the need for a much jury-friendly juror process . Under the first category , the article states the changes infallible , thusIt is imperative that steps be taken to install it easier for juries to...If you take to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay